H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
John Marks vs Neale Fraser H2H: 0-1
Neale Fraser holds a 1–0 lead over John Marks in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neale Fraser leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Neale Fraser won the 1971 Melbourne second round 7-6 6-7 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1971* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Neale Fraser | 7-6 6-7 6-0 6-3 | John Marks | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Marks | #223 | #60 | 0 | 1,631 | 30 | 81 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neale Fraser | #326 | #188 | 0 | 1,550 | 13 | 21 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Marks | Neale Fraser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #330 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 4–26 | 13.3% | #115 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |