H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

John McEnroe vs Jim Grabb H2H: 2-1

John McEnroe holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while John McEnroe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John McEnroe won the 1992 Canada Masters third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John McEnroe
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 1992* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard John McEnroe #18 6-1 6-1 Jim Grabb #72 Match data
Jun 12, 1992* Rosmalen ATP 250 R16 Grass John McEnroe #35 6-2 7-6(7) Jim Grabb #73 Match data
Mar 7, 1991* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jim Grabb #73 7-6(7) 7-5 John McEnroe #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
John McEnroe #1,219 #1 1,506 2,496 833 189 81.5% 7 3 3 0 63 76
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John McEnroe Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1976 1–1 50.0% #264 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 28–14 66.7% #21 1,852 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1978 77–19 80.2% #4 2,149 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1979 88–13 87.1% #3 2,284 1 15 — — — — — — —
21 1980 83–16 83.8% #2 2,255 2 24 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1981 67–9 88.2% #1 2,265 4 33 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1982 64–10 86.5% #1 2,278 4 38 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1983 62–9 87.3% #1 2,306 5 45 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1984 71–2 97.3% #1 2,475 7 58 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1985 69–9 88.5% #2 2,273 7 66 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1
27 1986 22–5 81.5% #14 2,180 7 69 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1
28 1987 30–10 75.0% #10 2,094 7 69 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2
29 1988 29–9 76.3% #11 2,023 7 71 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 1989 45–11 80.4% #4 2,096 7 74 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2
31 1990 33–15 68.8% #13 1,967 7 75 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2
32 1991 32–18 64.0% #28 1,831 7 76 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2
33 1992 32–18 64.0% #20 1,882 7 76 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2
35 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,871 7 76 — — — — — — —