H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
John McEnroe vs Kim Warwick H2H: 5-0
John McEnroe holds a 5–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, John McEnroe leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John McEnroe won the 1982 Brussels third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1982* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John McEnroe | (w/o) | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1980* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | F | Grass | John McEnroe | 6-3 6-1 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1980* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | John McEnroe | 6-2 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1979* | New Orleans | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | John McEnroe | 6-4 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1978* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | John McEnroe | 6-1 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | #1,219 | #1 | 1,506 | 2,496 | 833 | 189 | 81.5% | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 63 | 76 |
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John McEnroe | Kim Warwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #21 | 1,852 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 77–19 | 80.2% | #4 | 2,149 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 88–13 | 87.1% | #3 | 2,284 | 1 | 15 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 83–16 | 83.8% | #2 | 2,255 | 2 | 24 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,265 | 4 | 33 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,278 | 4 | 38 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 62–9 | 87.3% | #1 | 2,306 | 5 | 45 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 71–2 | 97.3% | #1 | 2,475 | 7 | 58 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,273 | 7 | 66 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1986 | 22–5 | 81.5% | #14 | 2,180 | 7 | 69 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1987 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #10 | 2,094 | 7 | 69 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1988 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,023 | 7 | 71 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1989 | 45–11 | 80.4% | #4 | 2,096 | 7 | 74 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1990 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #13 | 1,967 | 7 | 75 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #28 | 1,831 | 7 | 76 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1992 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #20 | 1,882 | 7 | 76 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,871 | 7 | 76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |