H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
John Paish vs Graham Stilwell H2H: 1-1
John Paish and Graham Stilwell are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Paish leads 1–0 on carpet, while Graham Stilwell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Graham Stilwell won the 1968 London 2 fourth round 6-2 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 86
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1968* | London 2 | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Graham Stilwell | 6-2 6-1 6-2 | John Paish | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1968* | Aberavon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | John Paish | 7-9 7-5 7-5 | Graham Stilwell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Paish | #546 | #80 | 0 | 1,693 | 43 | 68 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Graham Stilwell | #62 | #62 | 0 | 1,734 | 97 | 181 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Paish | Graham Stilwell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 15–28 | 34.9% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–32 | 22.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 10–27 | 27.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 15–33 | 31.2% | #109 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1968 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #128 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #83 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1970 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1971 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1972 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1973 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #93 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1974 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #195 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1975 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #227 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,405 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |