H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
John Sadri vs Raul Ramirez H2H: 0-2
Raul Ramirez holds a 2–0 lead over John Sadri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raul Ramirez leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raul Ramirez won the 1981 Richmond Wct fourth round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1981* | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Raul Ramirez | 6-4 7-6 | John Sadri | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1980* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raul Ramirez | 6-7 7-6 7-5 | John Sadri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Sadri | #997 | #14 | 0 | 1,976 | 214 | 189 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Sadri | Raul Ramirez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #45 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1980 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1981 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1982 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #38 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 1984 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1985 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1986 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #130 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 |