H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

John Sobel vs Eduardo Bengoechea H2H: 0-1

Eduardo Bengoechea holds a 1–0 lead over John Sobel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eduardo Bengoechea leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eduardo Bengoechea won the 1989 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

John Sobel
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Eduardo Bengoechea
ARG Age 67 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eduardo Bengoechea #74 6-3 6-2 John Sobel #513 Match data Jul 13, 1989* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
John Sobel #868 #307 59 1,500 2 8 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eduardo Bengoechea #596 #21 273 1,805 101 112 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age John Sobel Eduardo Bengoechea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1980 0–3 0.0% #83 1,479 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1981 4–13 23.5% #90 1,477 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
24 1988 0–2 0.0% #524 1,474 0 0 1984 1–1 50.0% #110 1,457 0 0
25 1989 1–2 33.3% #419 1,469 0 0 1985 11–14 44.0% #102 1,527 0 0
26 1990 1–1 50.0% #397 1,484 0 0 1986 13–15 46.4% #79 1,579 0 0
27 1991 0–2 0.0% #666 1,464 0 0 1987 27–17 61.4% #24 1,737 0 0
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #846 1,452 0 0 1988 19–19 50.0% #92 1,740 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1989 18–16 52.9% #98 1,644 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1990 5–8 38.5% #178 1,586 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1991 3–3 50.0% #270 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age John Sobel Eduardo Bengoechea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 4 13 17 23.5% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — — — — —
26 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 25 14 39 64.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 2 7 71.4% 11 12 23 47.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 1 4 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — 13 12 25 52.0% 84 93 177 47.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age John Sobel Eduardo Bengoechea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1479 111.1 — — — — — +34 — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1477 121.3 — — — — — +10 — 34.1% -1.02 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.43
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1440 103.1 — — — — — +5 — 22.2% -1.33 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.23
24 1988 1474 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.17 1984 1457 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.08
25 1989 1469 98.7 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.88 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 1985 1527 123.4 — — — — +7 +4 — 47.8% -0.04 3–7 (30%) 7–7 (50%) — +1.80
26 1990 1485 101.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.01 1986 1579 123.9 — — — — — +12 — 46.5% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.89
27 1991 1465 96.3 -2.37 -0.41 0.615 38.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — 0.00 1987 1738 141.7 — — — — -202 +55 — 57.5% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.42
28 1992 1453 93.2 +0.16 -7.52 0.673 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.09 1988 1740 141.2 — — — — -214 +76 — 49.5% +0.07 7–7 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1644 126.3 — — — — -34 +63 — 53.6% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.76
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1586 113.9 — — — — +33 +74 — 42.9% -0.79 0–2 — — +0.94
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1614 117.6 +0.68 -0.38 0.998 49.6% — +66 — 50.0% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.37
Career — 1500 93.6 -1.11 -3.97 0.645 38.7% — — — 21.7% -2.39 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +6.20 — 1805 136.4 +0.68 -0.38 0.998 49.6% -80 +43 — 48.6% -0.11 31–41 (43%) 31–32 (49%) 98.0 +2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.