H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
John Yuill vs Cliff Richey H2H: 1-1
John Yuill and Cliff Richey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Yuill leads 1–0 on clay, while Cliff Richey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Yuill won the 1977 Washington second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 77
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1977* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | John Yuill | 6-3 6-2 | Cliff Richey | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1975* | Tuscon | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Cliff Richey | 6-1 7-6 | John Yuill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Yuill | #661 | #52 | 0 | 1,737 | 94 | 142 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Yuill | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1973 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1974 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1975 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #147 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1976 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1977 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #134 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1978 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #147 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1979 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #193 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1980 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #188 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |