H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 1-0

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1995 Rome Masters third round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 1995* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jonas Bjorkman #22 7-6(5) 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Andrei Chesnokov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6 — — — — — — —