H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Andrei Medvedev H2H: 4-0

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 4–0 lead over Andrei Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2000 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Andrei Medvedev
UKR Age 52 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonas Bjorkman #78 6-4 6-3 6-3 Andrei Medvedev #47 Match data Jun 28, 2000* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jonas Bjorkman #80 6-0 2-6 6-4 Andrei Medvedev #26 Match data May 4, 2000* R32 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jonas Bjorkman #35 1-6 6-1 6-2 Andrei Medvedev #103 Match data Mar 17, 1999* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #7 2-6 6-4 6-0 Andrei Medvedev #30 Match data Apr 30, 1998* R32 Munich Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,037 395 344 53.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Andrei Medvedev #679 #4 2,755 2,024 303 211 58.9% 0 4 0 3 4 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Andrei Medvedev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #1007 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 5–7 41.7% #227 1,543 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1992 32–12 72.7% #24 1,847 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 1993 58–24 70.7% #6 1,943 0 6
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1994 34–18 65.4% #15 1,818 0 8
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1995 39–26 60.0% #16 1,770 0 9
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1996 32–22 59.3% #35 1,775 0 10
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1997 30–23 56.6% #27 1,777 0 11
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,726 0 0 1998 22–22 50.0% #62 1,708 0 11
24 1996 23–25 47.9% #69 1,706 0 0 1999 22–23 48.9% #30 1,722 0 11
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,007 0 3 2000 20–17 54.1% #58 1,798 0 11
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 2001 9–16 36.0% #156 1,638 0 11
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,777 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,833 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2004 19–25 43.2% #70 1,680 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,743 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,657 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–13 35.0% #172 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Andrei Medvedev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 1 3 66.7% 23 6 29 79.3% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 26 6 32 81.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 9 19 52.6%
19 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 8 22 63.6% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 14 7 21 66.7% 12 10 22 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1994 17 14 31 54.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1995 23 14 37 62.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1998 12 8 20 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1996 13 16 29 44.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 1997 45 13 58 77.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 1998 22 15 37 59.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1999 18 16 34 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 18 37 51.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 15 16 31 48.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 237 203 440 53.9% 33 56 89 37.1% 79 44 123 64.2% 46 41 87 52.9% — 87 66 153 56.9% 157 85 242 64.9% 16 18 34 47.1% 43 42 85 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 657/739 of Jonas Bjorkman's and 456/513 of Andrei Medvedev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Andrei Medvedev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 12/12 2.5 3.2 58.7% 64.0% 44.7% 51.9% 56.2% 56.0% 43.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 40/44 5.2 2.9 53.9% 74.3% 54.0% 61.4% 46.9% 65.0% 41.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 71/82 6.7 3.7 55.3% 74.4% 50.3% 57.9% 45.7% 63.7% 40.0%
19 1991 1/1 0.0 1.0 45.3% 54.2% 37.9% 58.3% 100.0% 45.3% 26.8% 1994 46/52 2.9 1.8 64.2% 67.4% 51.1% 51.8% 45.8% 61.2% 42.3%
20 1992 1/1 1.0 1.0 40.5% 64.7% 36.0% 33.3% 0.0% 47.6% 26.7% 1995 60/65 5.7 3.7 52.6% 72.1% 49.0% 56.1% 45.2% 61.1% 41.5%
21 1993 12/14 3.3 5.7 53.3% 70.4% 44.2% 53.0% 46.1% 58.0% 41.6% 1996 47/54 5.7 3.7 59.2% 72.0% 48.8% 58.7% 44.4% 62.6% 41.4%
22 1994 48/57 4.0 5.1 54.7% 72.4% 45.8% 57.0% 39.3% 60.2% 41.3% 1997 49/53 5.3 3.6 57.9% 71.5% 49.2% 58.4% 44.5% 61.9% 40.2%
23 1995 53/61 3.9 3.7 53.5% 70.4% 48.2% 50.9% 40.9% 60.2% 41.2% 1998 39/44 7.2 4.9 58.7% 73.4% 49.3% 51.7% 45.7% 63.4% 40.1%
24 1996 45/48 3.8 3.9 57.8% 69.7% 48.4% 55.4% 37.1% 60.6% 40.2% 1999 38/45 6.7 4.6 54.7% 71.7% 47.3% 62.1% 36.6% 60.7% 40.1%
25 1997 71/91 4.4 3.2 54.3% 73.1% 52.2% 61.0% 45.1% 63.6% 43.1% 2000 33/37 5.5 2.7 56.5% 69.4% 48.4% 64.1% 41.6% 60.1% 41.0%
26 1998 50/58 3.9 3.3 58.0% 68.9% 49.5% 57.2% 46.1% 60.7% 41.5% 2001 21/25 4.9 3.8 59.6% 66.6% 45.9% 55.4% 37.9% 57.9% 35.9%
27 1999 40/45 3.1 3.2 57.7% 67.0% 51.0% 59.8% 41.9% 60.4% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 46/55 3.9 2.8 62.5% 70.9% 53.0% 57.5% 42.1% 64.3% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 41/47 3.0 3.2 58.7% 67.8% 49.0% 60.0% 37.4% 60.2% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 36/42 4.9 2.9 57.9% 71.7% 52.5% 60.1% 39.4% 63.5% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 45/49 5.5 2.9 58.3% 74.8% 51.7% 69.0% 50.0% 65.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 43/44 5.6 3.3 56.2% 70.6% 51.2% 56.5% 32.2% 62.3% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 39/39 4.4 3.7 54.6% 71.4% 51.7% 55.7% 42.0% 62.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 31/31 4.2 3.4 59.9% 70.2% 47.9% 47.9% 39.1% 61.1% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 36/36 4.4 3.1 61.3% 68.3% 48.4% 66.0% 42.1% 60.5% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 19/20 3.7 2.6 58.3% 70.5% 45.7% 49.7% 46.3% 60.6% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 657/739 4.2 3.4 57.2% 70.6% 49.8% 57.9% 41.6% 61.7% 39.8% — 456/514 5.6 3.5 57.0% 71.5% 49.4% 57.5% 44.3% 61.9% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Andrei Medvedev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1496 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.18
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1543 118.9 -1.75 +0.70 0.989 49.8% — +24 — 42.9% -0.43 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.21
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1847 153.1 +3.12 +2.55 1.194 53.1% -184 +76 — 68.2% +1.15 11–5 (69%) 12–7 (63%) — -1.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1944 158.4 +2.48 +2.81 1.101 51.7% -66 +103 -281 62.5% +0.63 18–5 (78%) 20–14 (59%) — -2.17
19 1991 1496 104.2 -1.46 -0.66 0.490 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.17 1994 1818 150.0 +0.65 +3.54 1.091 51.5% -27 +218 -93 61.4% +0.70 10–7 (59%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.30
20 1992 1489 100.9 -1.75 +1.16 0.509 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 1995 1770 149.0 -0.07 +3.50 1.068 51.2% +18 +191 -102 60.7% +0.53 10–12 (45%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.49
21 1993 1559 126.9 -2.47 +3.06 0.990 49.7% +42 — — 45.2% -0.39 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.04 1996 1775 145.7 +0.87 +2.95 1.106 51.8% +78 +15 — 59.9% +0.59 8–12 (40%) 10–8 (56%) — +1.39
22 1994 1752 141.1 -1.19 +3.27 1.037 50.4% -19 -167 -55 51.7% +0.25 12–7 (63%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.47 1997 1778 147.6 +0.87 +2.49 1.056 50.9% -8 +111 -111 55.6% +0.40 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.37
23 1995 1727 144.5 -1.62 +2.91 1.034 50.1% +48 -136 -62 54.8% +0.21 11–10 (52%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.57 1998 1709 143.8 +1.21 +2.55 1.096 51.2% +37 +107 -36 51.3% +0.14 9–11 (45%) 9–17 (35%) — -0.59
24 1996 1706 138.7 -0.83 +2.45 1.021 50.2% -1 -32 -43 50.7% +0.09 9–13 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.41 1999 1723 140.7 -1.33 +2.29 1.019 50.4% +10 +112 -103 54.5% +0.07 4–9 (31%) 11–3 (79%) — -0.43
25 1997 2007 158.3 +1.45 +5.73 1.183 53.1% +37 -327 -297 67.1% +1.05 13–9 (59%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.40 2000 1798 142.8 -0.85 +3.14 1.028 50.5% -102 +103 -214 53.2% +0.12 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) — -2.36
26 1998 1874 148.6 -0.77 +3.53 1.056 51.1% +16 -202 -75 57.2% +0.41 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.24 2001 1638 125.0 -3.29 -0.99 0.853 47.0% +41 +100 — 40.3% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.39
27 1999 1747 143.3 -0.90 +2.45 1.021 50.3% +59 -134 +15 49.6% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1777 137.7 +1.95 +1.81 1.092 51.6% -17 -188 +73 51.8% +0.35 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1736 138.2 -1.27 +2.62 1.013 50.3% -6 -195 +85 51.8% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1749 145.8 +1.10 +2.01 1.068 51.0% +17 -277 +105 50.0% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1834 142.2 +2.29 +1.49 1.106 51.9% -30 -284 +79 57.1% +0.58 6–3 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1681 133.1 -0.67 -0.20 0.932 48.8% +15 -142 +166 43.2% -0.35 9–6 (60%) 7–14 (33%) — -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1744 132.0 -0.19 +2.61 1.076 51.0% -2 — +95 48.9% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 1678 123.4 -1.15 -0.31 0.946 48.8% -99 — +317 44.7% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1658 132.4 -2.28 +1.93 0.983 50.2% -111 -113 +323 48.6% +0.03 7–7 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1645 125.3 -0.81 -2.46 0.858 47.1% -25 -106 +251 34.7% -0.92 4–2 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2037 147.3 -0.26 +2.40 1.039 50.6% +5 -178 +71 52.5% +0.20 113–114 (50%) 123–120 (51%) 97.3 -0.42 — 2024 153.4 +0.63 +2.66 1.070 51.2% -8 +115 -152 57.7% +0.42 93–82 (53%) 108–87 (55%) 100.8 -1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.