H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Boris Becker H2H: 2-1
Jonas Bjorkman holds a 2–1 lead over Boris Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Boris Becker leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1999 Dubai third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1999* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-4 | Boris Becker | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1997* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | R16 | Carpet | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-2 | Boris Becker | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1995* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Boris Becker | 6-3 6-1 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Boris Becker | #257 | #1 | 4,297 | 2,266 | 670 | 219 | 75.4% | 6 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 30 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Boris Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #6 | 2,066 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 65–13 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,229 | 2 | 9 |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,040 | 2 | 12 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 50–9 | 84.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 2 | 19 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 54–8 | 87.1% | #2 | 2,232 | 4 | 24 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 69–14 | 83.1% | #2 | 2,206 | 4 | 29 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,112 | 5 | 31 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,145 | 5 | 36 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,885 | 5 | 38 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #3 | 2,052 | 5 | 42 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #4 | 2,043 | 5 | 44 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,083 | 6 | 49 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #62 | 1,914 | 6 | 49 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #69 | 1,874 | 6 | 49 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #131 | 1,863 | 6 | 49 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |