H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-1

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 4–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2001 Stockholm third round 6-3 6-4.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 2001* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #88 6-3 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #53 Match data
Jan 11, 2001* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #44 7-6(2) 6-3 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Nov 11, 1999* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #76 1-6 6-2 6-3 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data
Sep 2, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #12 6-2 4-6 6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Oct 12, 1995* Ostrava ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #32 7-6(5) 7-5 Cedric Pioline #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6