H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Chuck Adams H2H: 0-2

Chuck Adams holds a 2–0 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chuck Adams leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1994 Schenectady semifinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Chuck Adams
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #70 6-3 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #88 Match data Aug 27, 1994* SF Schenectady ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Chuck Adams #70 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #106 Match data Oct 22, 1993* R16 China Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,037 395 344 53.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Chuck Adams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,726 0 0 1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1
24 1996 23–25 47.9% #69 1,706 0 0 1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,007 0 3 1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,777 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,833 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2004 19–25 43.2% #70 1,680 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,743 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,657 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–13 35.0% #172 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Chuck Adams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1994 17 14 31 54.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1995 23 14 37 62.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1996 13 16 29 44.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 1997 45 13 58 77.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1996 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 22 15 37 59.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 18 16 34 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 18 37 51.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 15 16 31 48.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 237 203 440 53.9% 33 56 89 37.1% 79 44 123 64.2% 46 41 87 52.9% — 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Chuck Adams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1477 102.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 — +0.05
19 1991 1496 104.2 -1.46 -0.66 0.490 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.17 1990 1489 106.0 — — — — +43 — — 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 1992 1489 100.9 -1.75 +1.16 0.509 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 1991 1574 124.7 — — — — +39 — — 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.24
21 1993 1559 126.9 -2.47 +3.06 0.990 49.7% +42 — — 45.2% -0.39 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.04 1992 1586 122.1 — — — — +32 — — 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.11
22 1994 1752 141.1 -1.19 +3.27 1.037 50.4% -19 -167 -55 51.7% +0.25 12–7 (63%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.47 1993 1697 140.4 — — — — +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.71
23 1995 1727 144.5 -1.62 +2.91 1.034 50.1% +48 -136 -62 54.8% +0.21 11–10 (52%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.57 1994 1736 140.3 — — — — +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.79
24 1996 1706 138.7 -0.83 +2.45 1.021 50.2% -1 -32 -43 50.7% +0.09 9–13 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.41 1995 1693 114.2 — — — — +57 -259 — 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) — +1.01
25 1997 2007 158.3 +1.45 +5.73 1.183 53.1% +37 -327 -297 67.1% +1.05 13–9 (59%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.40 1996 1619 115.7 — — — — +42 — — 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.07
26 1998 1874 148.6 -0.77 +3.53 1.056 51.1% +16 -202 -75 57.2% +0.41 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1747 143.3 -0.90 +2.45 1.021 50.3% +59 -134 +15 49.6% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1777 137.7 +1.95 +1.81 1.092 51.6% -17 -188 +73 51.8% +0.35 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1736 138.2 -1.27 +2.62 1.013 50.3% -6 -195 +85 51.8% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1749 145.8 +1.10 +2.01 1.068 51.0% +17 -277 +105 50.0% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1834 142.2 +2.29 +1.49 1.106 51.9% -30 -284 +79 57.1% +0.58 6–3 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1681 133.1 -0.67 -0.20 0.932 48.8% +15 -142 +166 43.2% -0.35 9–6 (60%) 7–14 (33%) — -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1744 132.0 -0.19 +2.61 1.076 51.0% -2 — +95 48.9% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 1678 123.4 -1.15 -0.31 0.946 48.8% -99 — +317 44.7% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1658 132.4 -2.28 +1.93 0.983 50.2% -111 -113 +323 48.6% +0.03 7–7 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1645 125.3 -0.81 -2.46 0.858 47.1% -25 -106 +251 34.7% -0.92 4–2 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2037 147.3 -0.26 +2.40 1.039 50.6% +5 -178 +71 52.5% +0.20 113–114 (50%) 123–120 (51%) 97.3 -0.42 — 1790 136.5 — — — — +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.