H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 0-3
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 3–0 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 1996 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-0 6-4 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1994* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | R16 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-4 6-2 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1993* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 7-5 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Goran Ivanisevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |