H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 1-2
Ivo Karlovic holds a 2–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on clay, while Ivo Karlovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2008 Nottingham third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2008* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ivo Karlovic | 6-3 6-4 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| May 31, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jonas Bjorkman | 3-6 3-6 6-4 7-6(2) 6-3 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2006* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ivo Karlovic | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ivo Karlovic | #1,066 | #14 | 2,295 | 1,998 | 357 | 333 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Ivo Karlovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #73 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #26 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #73 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #56 | 1,819 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #100 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #78 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #20 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #95 | 1,668 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #147 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,623 | 0 | 8 |