H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Jason Stoltenberg H2H: 4-4

Jonas Bjorkman and Jason Stoltenberg are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Jason Stoltenberg leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2001 Sydney fourth round 6-4 3-6 7-6(3).

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 2001* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #44 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) Jason Stoltenberg #63 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #76 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 0-6 6-4 Jason Stoltenberg #81 Match data
May 12, 1999* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jason Stoltenberg #39 4-6 6-4 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #28 Match data
Aug 17, 1998 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jason Stoltenberg #41 7-5 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #9 Match data
Jan 9, 1998* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Jason Stoltenberg #79 7-5 6-1 Jonas Bjorkman #4 Match data
May 11, 1997* Coral Springs ATP 250 F Clay Jason Stoltenberg #32 6-0 2-6 7-5 Jonas Bjorkman #23 Match data
Nov 10, 1994* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #54 7-5 6-3 Jason Stoltenberg #19 Match data
Sep 30, 1993* Kuala Lumpur (2) ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #107 6-4 2-0 (ret.) Jason Stoltenberg #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jason Stoltenberg #556 #19 1,299 1,923 294 259 53.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Jason Stoltenberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 1–4 20.0% #413 1,470 0 0
18 1988 13–11 54.2% #70 1,640 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1989 20–18 52.6% #84 1,692 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1990 17–19 47.2% #108 1,679 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1991 20–20 50.0% #75 1,716 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1992 10–16 38.5% #168 1,621 0 0
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1993 23–21 52.3% #44 1,694 0 1
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1994 38–25 60.3% #21 1,772 0 2
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1995 21–23 47.7% #80 1,736 0 2
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1996 32–25 56.1% #31 1,767 0 3
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1997 21–15 58.3% #79 1,768 0 4
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 1998 32–23 58.2% #27 1,789 0 4
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 1999 18–18 50.0% #80 1,715 0 4
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2000 21–14 60.0% #66 1,689 0 4
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2001 7–7 50.0% #185 1,681 0 4
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6