H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-2

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 4–2 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2000 Tokyo second round 6-4 3-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2000* Tokyo ATP 250 R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #59 6-4 3-6 7-6(6) Jeff Tarango #81 Match data
Feb 24, 2000* London ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #77 7-5 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #68 Match data
Sep 1, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #42 6-4 6-4 1-6 6-2 Jeff Tarango #72 Match data
Mar 13, 1997* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #35 6-4 6-2 Jeff Tarango #77 Match data
Jan 4, 1997* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Jeff Tarango #106 6-1 6-7(2) 7-6(15) Jonas Bjorkman #69 Match data
Oct 21, 1995* Vienna ATP 250 QF Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #30 6-2 6-3 Jeff Tarango #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6 — — — — — — —