H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-2

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 4–2 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2000 Japan Open round of 64 6-4 3-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonas Bjorkman #59 6-4 3-6 7-6(6) Jeff Tarango #81 Match data Oct 11, 2000* R64 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jeff Tarango #77 7-5 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #68 Match data Feb 24, 2000* R32 London ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #42 6-4 6-4 1-6 6-2 Jeff Tarango #72 Match data Sep 1, 1999* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #35 6-4 6-2 Jeff Tarango #77 Match data Mar 13, 1997* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jeff Tarango #106 6-1 6-7(2) 7-6(15) Jonas Bjorkman #69 Match data Jan 4, 1997* QF Adelaide International World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #30 6-2 6-3 Jeff Tarango #102 Match data Oct 21, 1995* QF Vienna Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,037 395 344 53.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,726 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1996 23–25 47.9% #69 1,706 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,007 0 3 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,746 0 4 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,777 0 4 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,735 0 4 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,833 0 5 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 2004 19–25 43.2% #70 1,680 0 5 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,743 0 6 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,657 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–13 35.0% #172 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 17 14 31 54.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1995 23 14 37 62.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1996 13 16 29 44.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1997 45 13 58 77.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1998 22 15 37 59.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1999 18 16 34 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2000 19 18 37 51.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 2001 15 16 31 48.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 237 203 440 53.9% 33 56 89 37.1% 79 44 123 64.2% 46 41 87 52.9% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 657/739 of Jonas Bjorkman's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 1/1 0.0 1.0 45.3% 54.2% 37.9% 58.3% 100.0% 45.3% 26.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1/1 1.0 1.0 40.5% 64.7% 36.0% 33.3% 0.0% 47.6% 26.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 12/14 3.3 5.7 53.3% 70.4% 44.2% 53.0% 46.1% 58.0% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 48/57 4.0 5.1 54.7% 72.4% 45.8% 57.0% 39.3% 60.2% 41.3% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1995 53/61 3.9 3.7 53.5% 70.4% 48.2% 50.9% 40.9% 60.2% 41.2% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1996 45/48 3.8 3.9 57.8% 69.7% 48.4% 55.4% 37.1% 60.6% 40.2% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1997 71/91 4.4 3.2 54.3% 73.1% 52.2% 61.0% 45.1% 63.6% 43.1% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1998 50/58 3.9 3.3 58.0% 68.9% 49.5% 57.2% 46.1% 60.7% 41.5% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 1999 40/45 3.1 3.2 57.7% 67.0% 51.0% 59.8% 41.9% 60.4% 40.4% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 2000 46/55 3.9 2.8 62.5% 70.9% 53.0% 57.5% 42.1% 64.3% 39.0% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 2001 41/47 3.0 3.2 58.7% 67.8% 49.0% 60.0% 37.4% 60.2% 40.3% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 2002 36/42 4.9 2.9 57.9% 71.7% 52.5% 60.1% 39.4% 63.5% 39.0% 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 2003 45/49 5.5 2.9 58.3% 74.8% 51.7% 69.0% 50.0% 65.1% 38.6% 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 2004 43/44 5.6 3.3 56.2% 70.6% 51.2% 56.5% 32.2% 62.3% 35.2% 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
33 2005 39/39 4.4 3.7 54.6% 71.4% 51.7% 55.7% 42.0% 62.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 31/31 4.2 3.4 59.9% 70.2% 47.9% 47.9% 39.1% 61.1% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 36/36 4.4 3.1 61.3% 68.3% 48.4% 66.0% 42.1% 60.5% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 19/20 3.7 2.6 58.3% 70.5% 45.7% 49.7% 46.3% 60.6% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 657/739 4.2 3.4 57.2% 70.6% 49.8% 57.9% 41.6% 61.7% 39.8% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1991 1496 104.2 -1.46 -0.66 0.490 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.17 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1992 1489 100.9 -1.75 +1.16 0.509 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1993 1559 126.9 -2.47 +3.06 0.990 49.7% +42 — — 45.2% -0.39 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.04 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1994 1752 141.1 -1.19 +3.27 1.037 50.4% -19 -167 -55 51.7% +0.25 12–7 (63%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.47 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1995 1727 144.5 -1.62 +2.91 1.034 50.1% +48 -136 -62 54.8% +0.21 11–10 (52%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.57 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1996 1706 138.7 -0.83 +2.45 1.021 50.2% -1 -32 -43 50.7% +0.09 9–13 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.41 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1997 2007 158.3 +1.45 +5.73 1.183 53.1% +37 -327 -297 67.1% +1.05 13–9 (59%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.40 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1998 1874 148.6 -0.77 +3.53 1.056 51.1% +16 -202 -75 57.2% +0.41 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.24 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 1999 1747 143.3 -0.90 +2.45 1.021 50.3% +59 -134 +15 49.6% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.35 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 2000 1777 137.7 +1.95 +1.81 1.092 51.6% -17 -188 +73 51.8% +0.35 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.25 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 2001 1736 138.2 -1.27 +2.62 1.013 50.3% -6 -195 +85 51.8% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.20 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 2002 1749 145.8 +1.10 +2.01 1.068 51.0% +17 -277 +105 50.0% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.63 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 2003 1834 142.2 +2.29 +1.49 1.106 51.9% -30 -284 +79 57.1% +0.58 6–3 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.40 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 2004 1681 133.1 -0.67 -0.20 0.932 48.8% +15 -142 +166 43.2% -0.35 9–6 (60%) 7–14 (33%) — -1.48 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 2005 1744 132.0 -0.19 +2.61 1.076 51.0% -2 — +95 48.9% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.47 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
34 2006 1678 123.4 -1.15 -0.31 0.946 48.8% -99 — +317 44.7% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1658 132.4 -2.28 +1.93 0.983 50.2% -111 -113 +323 48.6% +0.03 7–7 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1645 125.3 -0.81 -2.46 0.858 47.1% -25 -106 +251 34.7% -0.92 4–2 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2037 147.3 -0.26 +2.40 1.039 50.6% +5 -178 +71 52.5% +0.20 113–114 (50%) 123–120 (51%) 97.3 -0.42 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.