H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Jim Grabb H2H: 0-1
Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1995 Philadelphia third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1995* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 6-1 6-4 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |