H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Juan Monaco H2H: 0-1
Juan Monaco holds a 1–0 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2008 Stockholm third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2008* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-2 6-4 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Juan Monaco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |