H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Karel Novacek H2H: 2-0
Jonas Bjorkman holds a 2–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1995 Ostrava fourth round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1995* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1995* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 7-5 6-2 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Karel Novacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |