H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 3-4

Mark Philippoussis holds a 4–3 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2002 Memphis third round 7-6(6) 7-6(1).

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 21, 2002* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #44 7-6(6) 7-6(1) Mark Philippoussis #67 Match data
Oct 3, 1998* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals QF Hard Mark Philippoussis #15 4-6 7-6(1) 6-1 Jonas Bjorkman #13 Match data
Jun 14, 1997* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass Mark Philippoussis #19 2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #24 Match data
Mar 22, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #29 6-3 6-4 Mark Philippoussis #28 Match data
Sep 26, 1996* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #54 6-1 4-6 7-5 Mark Philippoussis #20 Match data
Aug 15, 1996* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Philippoussis #37 6-4 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #56 Match data
Mar 4, 1995* Scottsdale ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Philippoussis #272 3-6 6-4 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6