H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 2-2

Jonas Bjorkman and Nicklas Kulti are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1997 Adelaide third round 7-5 6-1.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
SWE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 2, 1997* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #69 7-5 6-1 Nicklas Kulti #64 Match data
Aug 14, 1996* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #56 6-3 6-2 Nicklas Kulti #65 Match data
Apr 11, 1996* New Delhi ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicklas Kulti #122 6-3 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #48 Match data
Jul 8, 1993* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicklas Kulti #57 6-4 6-1 Jonas Bjorkman #122 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicklas Kulti #977 #32 826 1,819 150 179 45.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Nicklas Kulti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 3–4 42.9% #176 1,543 0 0
18 1989 7–9 43.8% #118 1,581 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1990 15–11 57.7% #51 1,745 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1991 18–24 42.9% #80 1,656 0 1
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1992 18–23 43.9% #79 1,611 0 1
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1993 27–24 52.9% #46 1,690 0 2
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1994 20–26 43.5% #99 1,675 0 2
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1995 6–8 42.9% #165 1,638 0 2
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1996 14–16 46.7% #64 1,636 0 3
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1997 9–17 34.6% #154 1,578 0 3
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1998 3–3 50.0% #290 1,602 0 3
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 1999 10–9 52.6% #118 1,632 0 3
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 2000 0–5 0.0% #421 1,558 0 3
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6