H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-2
Nicolas Almagro holds a 2–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2007 Bastad fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2007* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 6-2 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2007* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 7-5 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2006* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Nicolas Almagro | 6-7(4) 7-6(7) 7-6(2) | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |