H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 3-4

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 4–3 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2003 Paris Masters third round 6-4 6-1.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 20, 2008 Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Clay Nicolas Lapentti #98 6-2 7-5 Jonas Bjorkman #57 Match data
Oct 30, 2003* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #41 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Lapentti #57 Match data
Sep 27, 2002* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #56 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #30 Match data
Aug 1, 2001* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #23 6-2 5-7 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #46 Match data
Mar 15, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #27 6-3 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #51 Match data
Oct 13, 2000* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #16 4-6 7-5 7-6(4) Jonas Bjorkman #59 Match data
Mar 15, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #8 6-3 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #65 Match data
Feb 17, 2000* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #69 7-6(5) 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6