H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 1-2

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 2–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on clay, while Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2007 Doha fourth round 6-4 6-3.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 5, 2007* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #3 6-4 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #54 Match data
Jun 24, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jonas Bjorkman #97 6-7(4) 1-2 (ret.) Nikolay Davydenko #7 Match data
May 30, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #116 6-3 6-2 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6