H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 4-5

Patrick Rafter holds a 5–4 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2000 Hong Kong fourth round 6-4 5-7 6-3.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 2000* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Patrick Rafter #18 6-4 5-7 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #56 Match data
Jun 25, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Patrick Rafter #2 6-2 7-6(3) 6-7(7) 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #36 Match data
Sep 11, 1998* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Patrick Rafter #3 6-2 6-3 7-5 Jonas Bjorkman #12 Match data
Aug 9, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Patrick Rafter #5 6-3 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #7 Match data
Nov 8, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Jonas Bjorkman #4 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Patrick Rafter #3 Match data
Mar 7, 1997* Scottsdale ATP 250 R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #38 3-6 6-1 7-6(2) Patrick Rafter #43 Match data
Aug 2, 1996* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #60 6-3 3-6 6-3 Patrick Rafter #65 Match data
Mar 3, 1995* Scottsdale ATP 250 R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #49 6-2 6-3 Patrick Rafter #20 Match data
Oct 20, 1994* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Patrick Rafter #23 6-3 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,104 332 177 65.2% 2 2 0 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Patrick Rafter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,619 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,803 0 1
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,777 0 1
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,761 0 1
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,035 1 2
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,010 2 8
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,933 2 9
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 2000 30–16 65.2% #15 1,889 2 10
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,989 2 11
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6