H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Rainer Schuettler H2H: 1-1
Jonas Bjorkman and Rainer Schuettler are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rainer Schuettler leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rainer Schuettler won the 2002 Moscow fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2002* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rainer Schuettler | 6-1 6-3 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2001* | Sydney | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-4 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jonas Bjorkman | Rainer Schuettler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 |
| 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 |
| 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |