H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 3-0

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 3–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1996 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1996* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #58 6-3 7-6(3) Renzo Furlan #26 Match data
Nov 11, 1994* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #54 6-3 7-6(2) Renzo Furlan #41 Match data
Jan 13, 1994* Jakarta ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #95 3-6 7-5 6-2 Renzo Furlan #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,844 209 231 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Renzo Furlan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1992 24–28 46.2% #53 1,667 0 0
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,681 0 0
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,682 0 2
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,727 0 2
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1996 29–26 52.7% #40 1,695 0 2
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,580 0 2
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,548 0 2
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6 — — — — — — —