H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-3

Richard Krajicek holds a 3–2 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1999 Tokyo quarterfinal 3-6 7-5 6-1.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 1999* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Jonas Bjorkman #32 3-6 7-5 6-1 Richard Krajicek #4 Match data
Nov 2, 1997* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #10 6-4 0-1 (ret.) Richard Krajicek #11 Match data
Oct 26, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 SF Carpet Richard Krajicek #15 6-4 3-6 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #13 Match data
Aug 3, 1996* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Krajicek #8 3-6 7-5 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #60 Match data
Jun 5, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Richard Krajicek #14 6-3 6-2 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6