H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Scott Draper H2H: 2-2
Jonas Bjorkman and Scott Draper are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Scott Draper leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Scott Draper won the 2003 Scottsdale third round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Scott Draper | 6-3 7-6(5) | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1998* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Scott Draper | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-3 1-6 7-6(6) | Scott Draper | Match data |
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Scott Draper | 6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Scott Draper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |