H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 1-0
Jonas Bjorkman holds a 1–0 lead over Stefan Edberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1994 US Open third round 6-4 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-4 6-4 6-0 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |