H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Thomas Muster H2H: 0-3
Thomas Muster holds a 3–0 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1999 Sydney third round 7-5 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1999* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Muster | 7-5 6-7(2) 6-3 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1997* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Thomas Muster | 7-5 6-2 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Thomas Muster | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 |