H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Tim Henman H2H: 5-4

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 5–4 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Canada Masters second round 6-2 6-3.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #60 6-2 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #32 Match data
Oct 11, 2003* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #40 6-1 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #42 Match data
Jan 23, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #64 6-2 7-6(6) 6-4 Tim Henman #8 Match data
Jun 22, 2000* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Jonas Bjorkman #85 5-7 6-4 7-5 Tim Henman #14 Match data
Feb 12, 1999* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #8 6-3 7-6(7) Jonas Bjorkman #30 Match data
Oct 2, 1998* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #13 7-5 6-3 Tim Henman #11 Match data
Oct 25, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Jonas Bjorkman #13 6-2 3-6 6-3 Tim Henman #19 Match data
Jan 19, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #34 6-1 6-3 6-2 Tim Henman #90 Match data
Jun 22, 1995* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Tim Henman #219 7-6(7) 7-5 Jonas Bjorkman #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6