H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-1
Jonas Bjorkman and Tomas Zib are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 Washington third round 0-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2005* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 0-6 6-3 7-5 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Jan 30, 2003* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jonas Bjorkman | 7-5 6-3 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Bjorkman | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |