H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jonas Bjorkman vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 1-2
Vincent Spadea holds a 2–1 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2006 US Open second round 6-4 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-4 7-6(4) 6-2 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2005* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| May 3, 1996* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jonas Bjorkman | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |