H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 5-2

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 5–2 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2007 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonas Bjorkman #35 6-2 6-1 6-4 Wayne Arthurs #195 Match data Jul 1, 2007* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jonas Bjorkman #55 4-6 6-4 6-4 Wayne Arthurs #96 Match data Oct 28, 2004* R32 Stockholm Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Wayne Arthurs #128 4-6 6-2 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #30 Match data Mar 11, 2004* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jonas Bjorkman #60 6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 Wayne Arthurs #113 Match data Jun 23, 2002* F Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jonas Bjorkman #49 6-2 6-4 Wayne Arthurs #87 Match data Sep 28, 2001* R16 Hong Kong Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Wayne Arthurs #48 3-6 6-4 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #37 Match data Jun 22, 2001* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jonas Bjorkman #57 6-4 7-6(5) Wayne Arthurs #83 Match data Oct 20, 2000* R16 Shanghai Masters ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,037 395 344 53.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,726 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1996 23–25 47.9% #69 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,007 0 3 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,746 0 4 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,777 0 4 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,735 0 4 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,833 0 5 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0
32 2004 19–25 43.2% #70 1,680 0 5 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,743 0 6 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,657 0 6 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1
36 2008 7–13 35.0% #172 1,645 0 6 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Wayne Arthurs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 17 14 31 54.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 23 14 37 62.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 13 16 29 44.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 45 13 58 77.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 22 15 37 59.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 18 16 34 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 18 37 51.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2001 15 16 31 48.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
33 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 2006 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 2008 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 237 203 440 53.9% 33 56 89 37.1% 79 44 123 64.2% 46 41 87 52.9% — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 657/739 of Jonas Bjorkman's and 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Wayne Arthurs
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 1/1 0.0 1.0 45.3% 54.2% 37.9% 58.3% 100.0% 45.3% 26.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1/1 1.0 1.0 40.5% 64.7% 36.0% 33.3% 0.0% 47.6% 26.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 12/14 3.3 5.7 53.3% 70.4% 44.2% 53.0% 46.1% 58.0% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 48/57 4.0 5.1 54.7% 72.4% 45.8% 57.0% 39.3% 60.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 53/61 3.9 3.7 53.5% 70.4% 48.2% 50.9% 40.9% 60.2% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 45/48 3.8 3.9 57.8% 69.7% 48.4% 55.4% 37.1% 60.6% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 71/91 4.4 3.2 54.3% 73.1% 52.2% 61.0% 45.1% 63.6% 43.1% 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5%
26 1998 50/58 3.9 3.3 58.0% 68.9% 49.5% 57.2% 46.1% 60.7% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 40/45 3.1 3.2 57.7% 67.0% 51.0% 59.8% 41.9% 60.4% 40.4% 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2%
28 2000 46/55 3.9 2.8 62.5% 70.9% 53.0% 57.5% 42.1% 64.3% 39.0% 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2%
29 2001 41/47 3.0 3.2 58.7% 67.8% 49.0% 60.0% 37.4% 60.2% 40.3% 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2%
30 2002 36/42 4.9 2.9 57.9% 71.7% 52.5% 60.1% 39.4% 63.5% 39.0% 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6%
31 2003 45/49 5.5 2.9 58.3% 74.8% 51.7% 69.0% 50.0% 65.1% 38.6% 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0%
32 2004 43/44 5.6 3.3 56.2% 70.6% 51.2% 56.5% 32.2% 62.3% 35.2% 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5%
33 2005 39/39 4.4 3.7 54.6% 71.4% 51.7% 55.7% 42.0% 62.6% 40.3% 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2%
34 2006 31/31 4.2 3.4 59.9% 70.2% 47.9% 47.9% 39.1% 61.1% 36.8% 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0%
35 2007 36/36 4.4 3.1 61.3% 68.3% 48.4% 66.0% 42.1% 60.5% 38.9% 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8%
36 2008 19/20 3.7 2.6 58.3% 70.5% 45.7% 49.7% 46.3% 60.6% 33.8% 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2%
Career — 657/739 4.2 3.4 57.2% 70.6% 49.8% 57.9% 41.6% 61.7% 39.8% — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Wayne Arthurs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1991 1496 104.2 -1.46 -0.66 0.490 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1489 100.9 -1.75 +1.16 0.509 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 1559 126.9 -2.47 +3.06 0.990 49.7% +42 — — 45.2% -0.39 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 1752 141.1 -1.19 +3.27 1.037 50.4% -19 -167 -55 51.7% +0.25 12–7 (63%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 1727 144.5 -1.62 +2.91 1.034 50.1% +48 -136 -62 54.8% +0.21 11–10 (52%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 1706 138.7 -0.83 +2.45 1.021 50.2% -1 -32 -43 50.7% +0.09 9–13 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 2007 158.3 +1.45 +5.73 1.183 53.1% +37 -327 -297 67.1% +1.05 13–9 (59%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.40 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13
26 1998 1874 148.6 -0.77 +3.53 1.056 51.1% +16 -202 -75 57.2% +0.41 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1747 143.3 -0.90 +2.45 1.021 50.3% +59 -134 +15 49.6% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.35 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21
28 2000 1777 137.7 +1.95 +1.81 1.092 51.6% -17 -188 +73 51.8% +0.35 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.25 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57
29 2001 1736 138.2 -1.27 +2.62 1.013 50.3% -6 -195 +85 51.8% -0.05 4–9 (31%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.20 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74
30 2002 1749 145.8 +1.10 +2.01 1.068 51.0% +17 -277 +105 50.0% +0.10 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.63 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69
31 2003 1834 142.2 +2.29 +1.49 1.106 51.9% -30 -284 +79 57.1% +0.58 6–3 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.40 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07
32 2004 1681 133.1 -0.67 -0.20 0.932 48.8% +15 -142 +166 43.2% -0.35 9–6 (60%) 7–14 (33%) — -1.48 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96
33 2005 1744 132.0 -0.19 +2.61 1.076 51.0% -2 — +95 48.9% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.47 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89
34 2006 1678 123.4 -1.15 -0.31 0.946 48.8% -99 — +317 44.7% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.04 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19
35 2007 1658 132.4 -2.28 +1.93 0.983 50.2% -111 -113 +323 48.6% +0.03 7–7 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.58 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02
36 2008 1645 125.3 -0.81 -2.46 0.858 47.1% -25 -106 +251 34.7% -0.92 4–2 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.13 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58
Career — 2037 147.3 -0.26 +2.40 1.039 50.6% +5 -178 +71 52.5% +0.20 113–114 (50%) 123–120 (51%) 97.3 -0.42 — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.