H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jonas Bjorkman vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 2-6

Wayne Ferreira holds a 6–2 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 3–0 on grass and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2003 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 2-6 7-5.

SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Wayne Ferreira #29 6-4 2-6 7-5 Jonas Bjorkman #70 Match data
Apr 18, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jonas Bjorkman #39 7-5 3-6 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #19 Match data
Jan 23, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #4 6-7(3) 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #42 Match data
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Wayne Ferreira #8 6-2 6-4 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #22 Match data
Apr 15, 1995* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 QF Hard Wayne Ferreira #10 6-3 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #31 Match data
Oct 15, 1994* Tel Aviv ATP 250 QF Hard Wayne Ferreira #13 7-5 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #55 Match data
Jun 29, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Wayne Ferreira #20 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #94 Match data
Jun 17, 1994* Manchester ATP 250 R16 Grass Wayne Ferreira #22 7-5 3-6 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonas Bjorkman Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15
33 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6