H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jonas Svensson vs Henri Leconte H2H: 1-2
Henri Leconte holds a 2–1 lead over Jonas Svensson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1992 Lyon third round 4-6 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1992* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Henri Leconte | 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Jonas Svensson | 3-6 7-5 6-3 6-4 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Henri Leconte | 7-6 6-2 6-3 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Svensson | #1,304 | #10 | 1,420 | 1,972 | 252 | 200 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Svensson | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #831 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #103 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,835 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1988 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1989 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #81 | 1,718 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1993 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #33 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1994 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #183 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,620 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |