H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jonas Svensson vs Massimo Cierro H2H: 1-1
Jonas Svensson and Massimo Cierro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jonas Svensson won the 1992 Prague fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1992* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jonas Svensson | 6-4 6-3 | Massimo Cierro | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1985* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Massimo Cierro | 6-2 6-2 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Svensson | #1,304 | #10 | 1,420 | 1,972 | 252 | 200 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Massimo Cierro | #1,295 | #113 | 295 | 1,535 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Svensson | Massimo Cierro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #831 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #103 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,835 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #202 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #81 | 1,718 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #33 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #183 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,620 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #220 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |