H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jonas Svensson vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 1-0
Jonas Svensson holds a 1–0 lead over Pavel Slozil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonas Svensson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jonas Svensson won the 1986 Rome second round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jonas Svensson | 7-6 6-4 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Svensson | #1,304 | #10 | 1,420 | 1,972 | 252 | 200 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Svensson | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #831 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #103 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,835 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #81 | 1,718 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #33 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #183 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,620 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |