H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jonas Svensson vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 2-2
Jonas Svensson and Thomas Hogstedt are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1991 Stockholm Masters second round 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1991* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Thomas Hogstedt | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
| Mar 3, 1990* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jonas Svensson | 6-3 6-7 7-5 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jonas Svensson | 6-2 7-5 7-5 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1987* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Thomas Hogstedt | 6-4 6-4 7-5 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonas Svensson | #1,304 | #10 | 1,420 | 1,972 | 252 | 200 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonas Svensson | Thomas Hogstedt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #831 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #103 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,835 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #81 | 1,718 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #33 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #183 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,620 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |