H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Chip Hooper H2H: 0-2
Chip Hooper holds a 2–0 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chip Hooper leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chip Hooper won the 1984 Brisbane third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1984* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Chip Hooper | 6-1 6-4 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
| Dec 23, 1983* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Chip Hooper | 7-6 6-2 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Chip Hooper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |