H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jonathan Canter vs Chris Pridham H2H: 1-0

Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Pridham in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1985 Canadian Open round of 64 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonathan Canter
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Chris Pridham
CAN Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonathan Canter #130 6-0 7-6 Chris Pridham #335 Match data Aug 14, 1985* R64 Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonathan Canter #810 #36 244 1,794 68 96 41.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Chris Pridham #1,219 #75 433 1,650 51 75 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonathan Canter Chris Pridham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 2–5 28.6% #279 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 0–5 0.0% #225 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #73 1,637 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% #248 1,481 0 0
21 1986 27–22 55.1% #41 1,733 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% #263 1,471 0 0
22 1987 5–17 22.7% #169 1,601 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #114 1,483 0 0
23 1988 2–4 33.3% #182 1,584 0 1 1988 13–16 44.8% #137 1,526 0 0
24 1989 6–13 31.6% #183 1,533 0 1 1989 7–11 38.9% #146 1,553 0 0
25 1990 5–5 50.0% #191 1,559 0 1 1990 2–7 22.2% #155 1,488 0 0
26 1991 0–2 0.0% #408 1,539 0 1 1991 3–5 37.5% #132 1,492 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1992 14–16 46.7% #131 1,578 0 0
28 1993 2–1 66.7% #190 1,580 0 1 1993 11–15 42.3% #145 1,587 0 0
29 1994 0–3 0.0% #388 1,543 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,566 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonathan Canter Chris Pridham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 19 11 30 63.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1989 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1993 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 52 99 47.5% 3 11 14 21.4% 9 15 24 37.5% 9 18 27 33.3% — 36 49 85 42.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 8/8 of Jonathan Canter's and 61/65 of Chris Pridham's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jonathan Canter Chris Pridham
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 2/2 1.0 1.5 58.9% 72.4% 42.1% 47.2% 12.5% 59.9% 30.4% 1991 7/8 3.1 3.1 59.3% 72.8% 51.4% 71.7% 35.7% 64.0% 33.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 27/30 2.9 3.3 60.5% 69.9% 49.8% 59.5% 30.2% 61.9% 35.7%
28 1993 3/3 2.3 2.3 48.7% 73.3% 56.6% 45.0% 36.2% 64.8% 38.9% 1993 26/26 3.9 2.8 57.1% 69.6% 53.6% 59.0% 30.2% 62.8% 35.5%
29 1994 3/3 4.3 2.0 54.3% 63.2% 43.6% 56.1% 31.0% 54.5% 36.2% 1994 1/1 2.0 5.0 54.8% 67.6% 46.4% 57.1% 50.0% 58.1% 29.1%
Career — 8/164 2.8 2.0 53.4% 69.3% 48.1% 49.7% 28.3% 59.7% 35.8% — 61/126 3.3 3.1 58.8% 70.0% 51.6% 60.6% 31.2% 62.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonathan Canter Chris Pridham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1506 102.0 — — — — +34 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1513 105.9 — — — — +20 — — 27.8% -1.39 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1464 104.0 — — — — +10 — — 15.4% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1637 124.4 — — — — -52 — +5 55.3% +0.49 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — +2.25 1985 1482 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.34
21 1986 1734 139.0 — — — — +15 -236 -104 54.3% +0.18 11–11 (50%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.70 1986 1472 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
22 1987 1602 135.3 — — — — +44 -90 — 31.1% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.84 1987 1484 114.7 — — — — +31 — — 28.6% -0.71 1–0 0–1 — 0.00
23 1988 1584 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 31.3% -1.06 1–0 — — -0.02 1988 1527 113.0 — — — — -2 — +65 43.0% -0.51 5–3 (63%) 5–9 (36%) — +1.74
24 1989 1533 119.1 — — — — +51 — -31 42.6% -0.20 0–7 (0%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.68 1989 1553 117.5 — — — — +10 — +31 38.8% -0.55 4–3 (57%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.55
25 1990 1559 113.9 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.61 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.78 1990 1489 104.8 — — — — +21 — — 36.4% -0.82 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.95
26 1991 1540 106.6 -0.46 +0.70 0.758 45.5% — — — 16.7% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.20 1991 1493 107.7 +0.73 -1.59 0.929 49.5% +26 — — 38.9% -0.28 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.81
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1579 126.9 -0.38 -2.42 0.936 48.9% +35 — -20 45.1% -0.18 8–5 (62%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.59
28 1993 1580 116.6 +0.08 +1.04 1.103 51.6% +20 — — 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.04 1993 1587 128.0 +0.43 -1.47 0.953 49.3% +22 — — 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.79
29 1994 1543 103.5 -1.08 -0.13 0.796 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.29 — 0–2 — -0.22 1994 1566 97.9 -2.87 +0.77 0.694 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.25
Career — 1794 132.1 -0.49 +0.52 0.887 48.0% +18 -163 -19 44.1% -0.29 23–37 (38%) 21–34 (38%) 88.2 +2.44 — 1650 123.5 +0.05 -1.87 0.938 49.1% +19 — +37 41.9% -0.45 22–21 (51%) 23–39 (37%) 97.1 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.