Jonathan Canter
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Evernden | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 3, 1990 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Eliot Teltscher | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 1988 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 20, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 1-0
Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1986 Scottsdale round of 32 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | 6-3 6-3 | Dan Cassidy | Match data | Oct 9, 1986* | R32 | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,794 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jonathan Canter | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,401 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jonathan Canter | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1969 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1985 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1987 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1988 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1988 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1989 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1990 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 47 | 52 | 99 | 47.5% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% | Career | 23 | 41 | 64 | 35.9% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jonathan Canter | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1982 | 1506 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 26.7% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.78 | 1969 | 1486 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1983 | 1513 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 27.8% | -1.39 | 2–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.20 | 1984 | 1630 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | -17 | — | +2 | 58.3% | +0.25 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | +1.87 |
| 1984 | 1464 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 15.4% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.25 | 1985 | 1510 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -19 | +47 | 31.4% | -1.29 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +0.61 |
| 1985 | 1637 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | -52 | — | +5 | 55.3% | +0.49 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +2.25 | 1986 | 1512 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +35 | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.59 |
| 1986 | 1734 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -236 | -104 | 54.3% | +0.18 | 11–11 (50%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | +0.70 | 1987 | 1565 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -18 | — | 47.1% | -0.23 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.25 |
| 1987 | 1602 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -90 | — | 31.1% | -1.15 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.84 | 1988 | 1515 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -24 | — | 29.2% | -1.37 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | -0.50 |
| 1988 | 1584 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.06 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.02 | 1989 | 1457 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 37.8% | -1.13 | 0–6 (0%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.90 |
| 1989 | 1533 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | -31 | 42.6% | -0.20 | 0–7 (0%) | 1–7 (13%) | — | +0.68 | 1990 | 1402 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.44 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.08 |
| 1990 | 1559 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.61 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1540 | 106.6 | -0.46 | +0.70 | 0.758 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1580 | 116.6 | +0.08 | +1.04 | 1.103 | 51.6% | +20 | — | — | 62.5% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1543 | 103.5 | -1.08 | -0.13 | 0.796 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.29 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1794 | 132.1 | -0.49 | +0.52 | 0.887 | 48.0% | +18 | -163 | -19 | 44.1% | -0.29 | 23–37 (38%) | 21–34 (38%) | 88.2 | +2.44 | Career | 1630 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -6 | +20 | 36.1% | -1.01 | 12–20 (38%) | 19–26 (42%) | 94.0 | +2.31 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Dan Cassidy
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Tim Wilkison | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Darren Cahill | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 10, 1988 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 15, 1990 | H2H |