H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Danie Visser H2H: 2-1
Jonathan Canter holds a 2–1 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1987 Indian Wells second round 3-6 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1987* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jonathan Canter | 3-6 6-4 7-6 | Danie Visser | Match data |
| Dec 26, 1985* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jonathan Canter | 7-5 6-4 | Danie Visser | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1984* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Danie Visser | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |