H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jonathan Canter vs Danie Visser H2H: 2-1

Jonathan Canter holds a 2–1 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1987 Indian Wells Open round of 64 3-6 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonathan Canter
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonathan Canter #47 3-6 6-4 7-6 Danie Visser #85 Match data Feb 18, 1987* R64 Indian Wells Open ATP 500 Hard
Jonathan Canter #91 7-5 6-4 Danie Visser #136 Match data Dec 26, 1985* R32 Melbourne ATP 250 Grass
Danie Visser #74 6-2 2-6 6-3 Jonathan Canter #229 Match data Sep 13, 1984* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonathan Canter #810 #36 244 1,794 68 96 41.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonathan Canter Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 2–5 28.6% #279 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 0–5 0.0% #225 1,464 0 0 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #73 1,637 0 1 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1986 27–22 55.1% #41 1,733 0 1 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1987 5–17 22.7% #169 1,601 0 1 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1988 2–4 33.3% #182 1,584 0 1 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1989 6–13 31.6% #183 1,533 0 1 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1990 5–5 50.0% #191 1,559 0 1 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1991 0–2 0.0% #408 1,539 0 1 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1993 2–1 66.7% #190 1,580 0 1 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1994 0–3 0.0% #388 1,543 0 1 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonathan Canter Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 19 11 30 63.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1993 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 47 52 99 47.5% 3 11 14 21.4% 9 15 24 37.5% 9 18 27 33.3% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jonathan Canter Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 2/2 1.0 1.5 58.9% 72.4% 42.1% 47.2% 12.5% 59.9% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3/3 2.3 2.3 48.7% 73.3% 56.6% 45.0% 36.2% 64.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3/3 4.3 2.0 54.3% 63.2% 43.6% 56.1% 31.0% 54.5% 36.2% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
Career — 8/164 2.8 2.0 53.4% 69.3% 48.1% 49.7% 28.3% 59.7% 35.8% — 3/221 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonathan Canter Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1506 102.0 — — — — +34 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1513 105.9 — — — — +20 — — 27.8% -1.39 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1464 104.0 — — — — +10 — — 15.4% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.25 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1985 1637 124.4 — — — — -52 — +5 55.3% +0.49 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — +2.25 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.20
21 1986 1734 139.0 — — — — +15 -236 -104 54.3% +0.18 11–11 (50%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.70 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.59
22 1987 1602 135.3 — — — — +44 -90 — 31.1% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.84 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.82
23 1988 1584 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 31.3% -1.06 1–0 — — -0.02 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.53
24 1989 1533 119.1 — — — — +51 — -31 42.6% -0.20 0–7 (0%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.68 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55
25 1990 1559 113.9 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.61 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.78 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.15
26 1991 1540 106.6 -0.46 +0.70 0.758 45.5% — — — 16.7% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.20 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.16
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.79
28 1993 1580 116.6 +0.08 +1.04 1.103 51.6% +20 — — 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.04 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.54
29 1994 1543 103.5 -1.08 -0.13 0.796 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.29 — 0–2 — -0.22 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
Career — 1794 132.1 -0.49 +0.52 0.887 48.0% +18 -163 -19 44.1% -0.29 23–37 (38%) 21–34 (38%) 88.2 +2.44 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.