Jonathan Canter
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Evernden | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 3, 1990 | H2H |
| Henri Leconte | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Eliot Teltscher | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 1988 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 20, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Huub Van Boeckel H2H: 1-0
Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Huub Van Boeckel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1985 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | 6-3 6-1 | Huub Van Boeckel | Match data | Nov 21, 1985* | R32 | Hong Kong Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,794 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Huub Van Boeckel | — | — | — | 1,581 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Huub Van Boeckel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Huub Van Boeckel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1985 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1993 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 47 | 52 | 99 | 47.5% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% | — | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Huub Van Boeckel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1506 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 26.7% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1513 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 27.8% | -1.39 | 2–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 1464 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 15.4% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.25 | 1979 | 1488 | 93.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.08 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1637 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | -52 | — | +5 | 55.3% | +0.49 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.2 | +2.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 1734 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -236 | -104 | 54.3% | +0.18 | 11–11 (50%) | 10–11 (48%) | 99.3 | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1602 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -90 | — | 31.1% | -1.15 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.2 | -0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 1584 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.06 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.02 | 1983 | 1451 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -0.83 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.02 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1533 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | -31 | 42.6% | -0.20 | 0–7 (0%) | 1–7 (13%) | 86.2 | +0.68 | 1984 | 1500 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +60 | 52.2% | +0.09 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | +1.47 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1559 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.61 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.78 | 1985 | 1526 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -23 | +26 | 37.3% | -0.94 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.0 | +1.79 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1540 | 106.6 | -0.46 | +0.70 | 0.758 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1513 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.79 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.54 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1580 | 116.6 | +0.08 | +1.04 | 1.103 | 51.6% | +20 | — | — | 62.5% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.04 | 1988 | 1432 | 91.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.36 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.67 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1543 | 103.5 | -1.08 | -0.13 | 0.796 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.29 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1794 | 132.1 | -0.49 | +0.52 | 0.887 | 48.0% | +18 | -163 | -19 | 44.1% | -0.29 | 23–37 (38%) | 21–34 (38%) | 88.2 | +2.44 | — | 1582 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -23 | +44 | 34.8% | -1.05 | 9–10 (47%) | 4–9 (31%) | 98.2 | +8.96 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Huub Van Boeckel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Maurer | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 19, 1987 | — |
| Givaldo Barbosa | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 15, 1985 | — |
| Emilio Sanchez | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 25, 1985 | — |
| Dan Cassidy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Dec 29, 1984 | — |
| Paul Dogger | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 28, 1988 | — |