H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 1-0
Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1985 Melbourne semifinal 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1985* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Jonathan Canter | 7-6 7-6 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Mark Edmondson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 |