H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Mark Kratzmann H2H: 0-1
Mark Kratzmann holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Kratzmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Kratzmann won the 1990 Tokyo Outdoor third round 1-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1990* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Kratzmann | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,750 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Mark Kratzmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |