H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Mike Leach H2H: 1-2
Mike Leach holds a 2–1 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mike Leach leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mike Leach won the 1985 Australian Open first round 7-5 7-6 5-7 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1985* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mike Leach | 7-5 7-6 5-7 3-6 6-4 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1983* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonathan Canter | 2-6 6-3 7-6 | Mike Leach | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1982* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mike Leach | 6-1 6-4 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mike Leach | #999 | #29 | 0 | 1,784 | 73 | 102 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Mike Leach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #372 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #115 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #241 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |