H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jonathan Canter vs Peter Doohan H2H: 2-0

Jonathan Canter holds a 2–0 lead over Peter Doohan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1985 Melbourne final 5-7 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 61 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
AUS Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonathan Canter #91 5-7 6-3 6-4 Peter Doohan #110 Match data Dec 29, 1985* F Melbourne ATP 250 Grass
Jonathan Canter #254 6-2 6-3 Peter Doohan #72 Match data Feb 6, 1985* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonathan Canter #810 #36 244 1,794 68 96 41.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Peter Doohan #1,102 #43 140 1,737 50 82 37.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonathan Canter Peter Doohan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 3–5 37.5% 1,506 0 0
18 1983 2–5 28.6% #279 1,513 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,491 0 0
19 1984 0–5 0.0% #225 1,464 0 0 1980 1–2 33.3% 1,493 0 0
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #73 1,637 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,485 0 0
21 1986 27–22 55.1% #41 1,733 0 1 1982 3–3 50.0% 1,505 0 0
22 1987 5–17 22.7% #169 1,601 0 1 1983 1–2 33.3% #363 1,501 0 0
23 1988 2–4 33.3% #182 1,584 0 1 1984 10–9 52.6% #85 1,613 0 1
24 1989 6–13 31.6% #183 1,533 0 1 1985 18–19 48.6% #101 1,682 0 1
25 1990 5–5 50.0% #191 1,559 0 1 1986 0–7 0.0% #301 1,555 0 1
26 1991 0–2 0.0% #408 1,539 0 1 1987 12–15 44.4% #72 1,619 0 1
27 1988 4–13 23.5% #187 1,485 0 1
28 1993 2–1 66.7% #190 1,580 0 1 1989 1–5 16.7% #172 1,451 0 1
29 1994 0–3 0.0% #388 1,543 0 1 1990 0–2 0.0% #331 1,435 0 1
30 1991 0–1 0.0% #1131 1,427 0 1
31 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,421 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonathan Canter Peter Doohan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1986 19 11 30 63.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1982 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1987 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
24 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 4 9 13 30.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 2 7 9 22.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 1 8 9 11.1% 3 5 8 37.5%
28 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 47 52 99 47.5% 3 11 14 21.4% 9 15 24 37.5% 9 18 27 33.3% 8 37 45 17.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 38 35 73 52.1% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonathan Canter Peter Doohan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1506 102.0 +34 26.7% -2.00 1–0 +0.78
18 1983 1513 105.9 +20 27.8% -1.39 2–0 1–2 (33%) -0.20 1979 1492 99.9 0.0% -2.67 -0.08
19 1984 1464 104.0 +10 15.4% -2.00 0–2 +0.25 1980 1494 102.1 +22 25.0% -1.63 1–0 0–1 +0.01
20 1985 1637 124.4 -52 +5 55.3% +0.49 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) +2.25 1981 1485 113.1 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 -0.30
21 1986 1734 139.0 +15 -236 -104 54.3% +0.18 11–11 (50%) 10–11 (48%) +0.70 1982 1506 112.2 +15 46.2% +0.23 1–4 (20%) +0.42
22 1987 1602 135.3 +44 -90 31.1% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) -0.84 1983 1501 111.3 +33 28.6% 0.00 0–2 +0.19
23 1988 1584 107.3 +48 31.3% -1.06 1–0 -0.02 1984 1614 118.7 -73 -99 +60 53.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 7–4 (64%) +1.08
24 1989 1533 119.1 +51 -31 42.6% -0.20 0–7 (0%) 1–7 (13%) +0.68 1985 1683 129.4 -157 -162 +79 51.2% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 5–3 (63%) +0.42
25 1990 1559 113.9 +34 50.0% +0.61 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) +0.78 1986 1555 90.8 -80 0.0% -3.09 0–1 +0.41
26 1991 1540 106.6 -0.46 +0.70 0.758 45.5% 16.7% -1.67 0–1 -0.20 1987 1619 131.2 -147 +163 45.6% -0.29 5–5 (50%) 8–9 (47%) -0.16
27 1988 1485 100.1 -71 +180 31.0% -1.17 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) +1.01
28 1993 1580 116.6 +0.08 +1.04 1.103 51.6% +20 62.5% +0.50 1–1 +0.04 1989 1451 100.7 -54 14.3% -1.78 1–0 0–1 +0.50
29 1994 1543 103.5 -1.08 -0.13 0.796 46.0% 0.0% -2.29 0–2 -0.22 1990 1435 98.9 0.0% -4.40 -0.10
30 1991 1428 101.8 +1.97 -1.36 0.654 44.9% 0.0% -1.67 0–1 -0.04
31 1992 1422 100.9 -2.70 -1.59 0.421 38.9% 0.0% -3.00 -0.07
Career 1794 132.1 -0.49 +0.52 0.887 48.0% +18 -163 -19 44.1% -0.29 23–37 (38%) 21–34 (38%) 88.2 +2.44 1738 123.6 -0.37 -1.48 0.532 41.9% -114 -112 +99 40.4% -0.57 13–21 (38%) 23–31 (43%) 93.6 +2.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.