H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jonathan Canter vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 1-2

Ramesh Krishnan holds a 2–1 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ramesh Krishnan leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ramesh Krishnan won the 1988 Miami Open round of 64 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonathan Canter
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Ramesh Krishnan
IND Age 65 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ramesh Krishnan 6-3 6-4 6-4 Jonathan Canter #178 Match data Mar 16, 1988* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Ramesh Krishnan 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jonathan Canter #36 Match data Oct 18, 1986* QF Japan Open ATP 250 Hard
Jonathan Canter #40 7-5 6-4 Ramesh Krishnan Match data Aug 20, 1986* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonathan Canter #810 #36 244 1,794 68 96 41.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ramesh Krishnan — — — 1,892 278 249 52.8% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonathan Canter Ramesh Krishnan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
17 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,506 0 0 1978 6–5 54.5% — 1,537 0 0
18 1983 2–5 28.6% #279 1,513 0 0 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,584 0 0
19 1984 0–5 0.0% #225 1,464 0 0 1980 14–11 56.0% — 1,713 0 0
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #73 1,637 0 1 1981 13–16 44.8% — 1,755 0 1
21 1986 27–22 55.1% #41 1,733 0 1 1982 22–23 48.9% — 1,741 0 2
22 1987 5–17 22.7% #169 1,601 0 1 1983 20–21 48.8% — 1,749 0 2
23 1988 2–4 33.3% #182 1,584 0 1 1984 31–19 62.0% — 1,842 0 3
24 1989 6–13 31.6% #183 1,533 0 1 1985 23–21 52.3% — 1,805 0 3
25 1990 5–5 50.0% #191 1,559 0 1 1986 29–22 56.9% — 1,845 0 5
26 1991 0–2 0.0% #408 1,539 0 1 1987 29–22 56.9% — 1,790 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1988 28–15 65.1% — 1,757 0 6
28 1993 2–1 66.7% #190 1,580 0 1 1989 21–17 55.3% — 1,717 0 7
29 1994 0–3 0.0% #388 1,543 0 1 1990 20–21 48.8% — 1,698 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 1991 9–16 36.0% — 1,583 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 1992 4–5 44.4% — 1,616 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1993 2–2 50.0% — 1,639 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonathan Canter Ramesh Krishnan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 3 1 4 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1986 19 11 30 63.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1982 7 7 14 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1987 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 7 8 15 46.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 15 7 22 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1989 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0%
25 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 17 8 25 68.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 21 11 32 65.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 1993 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 52 99 47.5% 3 11 14 21.4% 9 15 24 37.5% 9 18 27 33.3% — 157 119 276 56.9% 33 53 86 38.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 46 44 90 51.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonathan Canter Ramesh Krishnan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1486 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 1982 1506 102.0 — — — — +34 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.78 1978 1537 115.0 — — — — +60 +16 — 54.5% +0.18 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.02
18 1983 1513 105.9 — — — — +20 — — 27.8% -1.39 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.20 1979 1584 128.8 — — — — +55 -24 — 39.6% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.61
19 1984 1464 104.0 — — — — +10 — — 15.4% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.25 1980 1713 127.2 — — — — -22 -93 -153 50.8% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.73
20 1985 1637 124.4 — — — — -52 — +5 55.3% +0.49 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — +2.25 1981 1755 140.6 — — — — +40 -135 — 45.1% -0.38 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.22
21 1986 1734 139.0 — — — — +15 -236 -104 54.3% +0.18 11–11 (50%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.70 1982 1742 139.3 — — — — +1 -23 -190 47.3% -0.16 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.02
22 1987 1602 135.3 — — — — +44 -90 — 31.1% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.84 1983 1749 145.4 — — — — +29 -115 -80 49.0% +0.04 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.76
23 1988 1584 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 31.3% -1.06 1–0 — — -0.02 1984 1843 148.4 — — — — +35 -224 -106 58.9% +0.72 11–6 (65%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.71
24 1989 1533 119.1 — — — — +51 — -31 42.6% -0.20 0–7 (0%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.68 1985 1806 149.5 — — — — -2 — +12 50.5% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.37
25 1990 1559 113.9 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.61 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.78 1986 1846 139.6 — — — — +4 -288 +69 58.3% +0.70 7–10 (41%) 4–8 (33%) — +1.08
26 1991 1540 106.6 -0.46 +0.70 0.758 45.5% — — — 16.7% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.20 1987 1790 139.1 — — — — +43 — +30 56.5% +0.43 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.98
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1758 134.4 — — — — +24 — +34 60.2% +0.74 9–7 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.37
28 1993 1580 116.6 +0.08 +1.04 1.103 51.6% +20 — — 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.04 1989 1717 136.6 — — — — +43 — — 54.4% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.03
29 1994 1543 103.5 -1.08 -0.13 0.796 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.29 — 0–2 — -0.22 1990 1699 138.1 — — — — +21 — +16 50.0% +0.07 8–10 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1583 123.4 — — — — -2 — — 41.0% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1616 131.3 — — — — +7 — — 40.9% -0.23 2–0 1–0 — -0.81
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1640 118.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.13 0–2 — — -0.39
Career — 1794 132.1 -0.49 +0.52 0.887 48.0% +18 -163 -19 44.1% -0.29 23–37 (38%) 21–34 (38%) 88.2 +2.44 — 1893 146.4 — — — — +22 -91 -23 52.1% +0.18 89–85 (51%) 69–75 (48%) 97.4 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.